Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:55:40 +0200 |
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Philip Fearon <pgfearo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:06 PM, James Fuller > <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Do any of these trends indicate anything with respect to peaking XSLT >> adoption ? ... considering these numbers I wonder if XSLT 2.0 >> adoption will be a very slow burn ? > > These graphs are interesting, but one of the reasons why its difficult > to draw conclusions from search trends on their own is the variety of > keywords (such as 'XSL', 'XSLT 2.0' or 'XML Stylesheet') that may be > used in a search . http://www.google.com/trends?q=xslt%2C+xsl%2C+xml+stylesheet&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] the future of xslt, Philip Fearon | Thread | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson |
Month |