Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:48:09 +0100 |
On Mon, Jun 23 2008 11:40:46 +0100, nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ... > Maybe we could use gcj to make Mike's xslt 2.0 implementation widely > available to other programming languages. I was looking at that the other day as an alternative to needing a libxslt 2.0. It should be doable, especially since Saxon on .Net gets there thanks to GNU Classpath [1]. Usually when I search for gcj and Saxon (I have looked into it before), I find references to compiling Saxon 6.5, but this time I found a mention of compiling Saxon 9. I was sceptical before, but maybe a gcj-compiled Saxon with a Compiled Native Interface (CNI) [3] would fly. Regards, Tony Graham Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2 [1] http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/index/installationdotnet.html [2] http://markmail.org/message/ilphyulmtc6gqabs [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_for_Java#CNI_.28Compiled_Native_Interface.29
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Nic | Thread | RE: [xsl] the future of xslt, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Grouping a List into A Gr, Florent Georges | Date | [xsl] group by tags, IZASKUN GUTIERREZ GU |
Month |