Subject: RE: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection() From: Mario Madunic <hajduk@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:32:45 -0700 |
I know we are only talking milliseconds here and what I'm currently working on is just over 100 docs. But when it comes down to the other projects I work on and it is now 10's of thousands if not 100's of thousands of docs then efficiency might come into play. (it is sometimes hard to explain to a manager why the process is taking so long, concept of time out the window the higher on the corporate ladder). So the processor I have is a dual core 2.00Ghz Intel chip and 2GB Ram. Not bad for a laptop. Marijan (Mario) Madunic Quoting Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Efficiency and speed depend entirely on the processor you are using: as > always, the rule is to try some experiments that are representative of your > particular situation. > > I would have thought collection() was more convenient here, but doc() more > portable. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mario Madunic [mailto:hajduk@xxxxxxxx] > > Sent: 26 June 2008 14:52 > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection() > > > > Working on converting an XSD to SVG (will hopefully look like > > TURBOXML's lovely view). I'm mainly using doc() with a regex > > to parse the various directories of XSD files. Since the XSD > > is built modularly and each element in its own file (I > > personally do not like reading XSDs or XSLTs (for that > > matter) in one large file and have to scroll up and down to > > make sense of it all, but that is another > > discussion) meaning there are a lot of files. So before I > > test it out and spend time on switching from doc() to > > collection() I was hoping for some feedback. > > > > Which is the better method? Which is faster or more efficient? > > > > Marijan (Mario) Madunic
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Andrew Welch |
Month |