RE: [xsl] invalid xpath?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] invalid xpath?

Subject: RE: [xsl] invalid xpath?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:22:16 +0100

> In one place the "." slipped into the 
> code instead of "$Arg", and the template operated on the 
> original text node instead of the partly processed one.

This is one advantage of xsl:function over xsl:template - it prevents
inadvertent use of expressions referring to the context node.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] invalid xpath?, (continued) Michael Ludwig - 2 Jul 2008 13:37:23 -0000 Michael Kay - 2 Jul 2008 14:00:20 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 2 Jul 2008 14:43:15 -0000 Trevor Nicholls - 2 Jul 2008 14:58:44 -0000 Michael Kay - 2 Jul 2008 18:23:43 -0000 <= Abel Braaksma - 2 Jul 2008 21:23:42 -0000 Trevor Nicholls - 2 Jul 2008 13:27:27 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] invalid xpath?, Trevor Nicholls	Thread	Re: [xsl] invalid xpath?, Abel Braaksma
Re: [xsl] applying templates to att, David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] invalid xpath?, Abel Braaksma
	Month