Subject: RE: [xsl] checking sequence inside processing-instruction From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:32:18 +0100 |
> > <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('page')"> > > I first thought that was a mistake. I always used the form > processing-instruction(page) instead (well, the rare times I > used it). > But I checked in the REC and saw that both forms are allowed. > Is there any particular reason behind that choice? XPath 1.0 required the quotes. XPath 2.0 allowed the unquoted name for consistency with the new syntax element(e) and attribute(a); it was felt that the quotes were a bad idea because they suggested to users that an arbitrary expression could be used here, rather than a constant name. I used the quotes because I didn't know whether the OP was using 1.0 or 2.0. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] checking sequence inside , Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] checking sequence inside , Ganesh Babu N |
Re: [xsl] XML Diff and Merge, bryan rasmussen | Date | Re: [xsl] <Übelkeit/> - ASCIIf, David Carlisle |
Month |