Subject: Re: [xsl] Copy results From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:03:39 +0100 |
> If you don't have a point in the calling application where it's easy to copy > a file, then your application architecture may be wrong. I think that in > nearly all production applications there should be some kind of framework > that invokes the XSLT (it might be Java, or XProc, or Ant, or Cocoon, or > something else) that allows you at the very least to fiddle around with > input and output files. Ideally it should allow you to construct a pipeline > of transformations. Well Cocoon is a serious investment, XProc seems like vapour-ware at the moment, leaving Ant and Java.... and as Ant is Java I guess you may as well use Ant. For batch transforms, I don't think you can beat Ant. For server-side stuff, I'm still going for standalone transforms + eXist... I've nosed around XProc with much anticipation, but can't seem to find much... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Copy results, Steven Ericsson-Zeni | Thread | Re: [xsl] Copy results, Steven Ericsson-Zeni |
Re: [xsl] Copy results, Steven Ericsson-Zeni | Date | Re: [xsl] Copy results, Michael Ludwig |
Month |