Re: [xsl] parameter lost in tunnel?

Subject: Re: [xsl] parameter lost in tunnel?
From: "Dan Ochs" <dan.ochs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:12:20 -0700
I'm not using xsl 2.0 and have taken a bit of a different, somewhat
linear approach, but this should work for what you are trying to do:

xsl:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
   <xsl:template match="/">
           <xsl:apply-templates select="doc/sect_break[1]"/>
   </xsl:template>

   <xsl:template match="sect_break">
       <xsl:variable name="depth" select="./@depth"/>
       <xsl:variable name="next_depth"
select="(following-sibling::sect_break)[1]/@depth"/>
       <xsl:variable name="elementName" select="concat('level',$depth)"/>
       <xsl:choose>
           <xsl:when test="$next_depth &gt; $depth">
               <xsl:element name="{$elementName}">
				   <xsl:apply-templates select="(following-sibling::sect_break)[1]"/>
               </xsl:element>
               <xsl:apply-templates
select="(following-sibling::sect_break[@depth = $depth])[1]"/>
           </xsl:when>
           <xsl:when test="$next_depth = $depth">
			   <xsl:element name="{$elementName}"/>
				<xsl:apply-templates select="(following-sibling::sect_break)[1]"/>
           </xsl:when>
           <xsl:otherwise><xsl:element name="{$elementName}"/></xsl:otherwise>
       </xsl:choose>
   </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>

input:
<doc>
   <sect_break depth="1"/>
   <sect_break depth="2"/>
   <sect_break depth="2"/>
   <sect_break depth="3"/>
   <sect_break depth="1"/>
</doc>

output:
<level1>
	<level2/>
	<level2>
		<level3/>
	</level2>
</level1>
<level1/>


thanks, dan

--
Dan Ochs, Principal Consultant
Wrycan Inc.
http://xsl.wrycan.com
dan(dot)ochsatwrycan(dot)com


On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:09 AM, tom s <tshmit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I've been struggling for more hours than I care to admit on a simple task - passing a parameter through a series of templates using tunnel="yes". For some reason my parameter seems to be lost along the way and inevitably ends up with the default value (0).
>
> In the abbreviated "sect_break" template below=2C the param "prev_depth" should start out at 0 then be set to 1 as it's passed through apply-templates the first time. But the next time sect_break is called prev_depth is 0 (or whatever default is specified in the param's select):
>
> <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";; xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";; xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions";;>
>    <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
>    <xsl:template match="/">
>            <xsl:apply-templates/>
>    </xsl:template>
>
>    <xsl:template match="sect_break">
>        <!-- prev_depth is the depth that we were at before encountering this sect_break -->
>        <xsl:param name="prev_depth" select="0" tunnel="yes"/>
>        <!-- depth is the depth indicated in the current sect_break -->
>        <xsl:variable name="depth" select="./@depth" as="xs:integer"/>
>        <xsl:variable name="direction" select="$depth - $prev_depth" as="xs:integer"/>
>        <xsl:choose>
>            <xsl:when test="$direction > 0">
>                <!-- going deeper in depth -->
>                sect_break depth=<xsl:value-of select="$depth"/>
>                <xsl:apply-templates>
>                    <xsl:with-param name="prev_depth" select="$depth" tunnel="yes" />
>                </xsl:apply-templates>
>            </xsl:when>
>            <!-- some other cases have been omitted for brevity -->
>        </xsl:choose>
>    </xsl:template>
>
> </xsl:stylesheet>
>
> Sample input:
> <doc>
>    <sect_break depth="1"/>
>    <sect_break depth="2"/>
>    <sect_break depth="2"/>
>    <sect_break depth="3"/>
>    <sect_break depth="1"/>
> </doc>
>
> (fwiw, the objective is to create a nested hierarchy from one that is defined unnested. eg:
>
> <level 1>
> <level 2>
> <level 2>
> <level 3>
> <level 1>
>
> becomes:
>
> <level 1>
>    <level 2>
>    </level>
>    <level 2>
>        <level 3>
>        </level>
>    </level>
> </level>
> <level 1>
> </level>
> )
>
> Thanks very much for any help!
>
> --Tom

Current Thread