Subject: Re: [xsl] Oracle XSLT processor available as a separate download? From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:17:51 +0100 |
>> Surely the Oracle >> processor can't be that bad?? > > Well, if you think of it in terms of attempting to run an XSLT 2.0 > transformation These are all issues with 1.0 transforms - I'm suggesting Oracle's 1.0 processor isn't conformant by a long way. So far in fact, that it must be something I'm doing wrong. >> I haven't had time to test it properly >> yet, so it may not be the case (apologies to Oracle if I'm talking >> rubbish!) Maybe someone else has the time and inclination... > > I wouldn't even bother. As far as I know (and someone please correct me if > I'm wrong) there isn't anything you get with the Java-based Oracle XSLT 2.0 > processor that you don't get with Saxon Sure, but not all projects are greenfield projects... sometimes you just have to work with what's there. I didn't even know an Oracle processor existed until a few weeks ago (!) and it would be good to know where it sits amongst the other processors. > OxygenXML + Oxygen XSLT Debugger + Saxon 9.x (SA preferably) == *HAPPINESS* Yes - oXygen is great. Jumping around variable and template declarations and references (ctrl -> shft -> d and ctrl -> shft -> r) is almost as good as ctrl -> clicking around in Java... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Oracle XSLT processor ava, M. David Peterson | Thread | [xsl] SFINAE in xslt?, Vladimir Nesterovsky |
Re: [xsl] coping with missing exter, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] selecting associated head, Michael Kay |
Month |