Subject: Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly walking the ancestor axis in 1.0 From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:50:05 +0100 |
2008/8/1 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> Or of course you can arrange that the attribute in the source is called >>> xml:lang and use the lang() function. > > Out of interest, does xml:lang annotate the input tree, or does the > lang() function walk the ancestor axis behind the scenes? Or is it > all implementation dependent? And possibly OT, why does xml:lang exist - as in, why is there a need for an inbuilt mechanism compared to a custom solution? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Dave Pawson |
Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] Tough XSL Question(s)..., Luke Stedman |
Month |