Subject: Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly walking the ancestor axis in 1.0 From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:53:03 +0100 |
> Then simply use keys as shown in my first reply to this thread. Yes (although you're just walking the ancestor axis once per node in a different place) Out of interest, I wonder how in-scope-prefixes() works - does any tree walking need to take place? If not, you could perhaps do: <foo xmlns:lang_cornish="..."> and then test for that: test="in-scope-prefixes(.) = 'lang_cornish'" -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] alternative to repeatedly, Michael Kay |
Month |