Subject: Re: [xsl] current() - referring to top in nested predicates From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:29:01 +0200 |
No, I wanted: "If the count of <B>s for the interval is zero, the interval is empty and I'm not interested;
what's the difference between "the count of B in the interval is zero" and "the next element is a T not a B" it appears to be the same as far as I can see, except the latter is easier to express in xpath.
Maybe a lack of precision, or too much verbosity, in my original post. An interval is *not* defined in terms document position, but in terms of the numbers in the text nodes attached to the <T> elements. I wrote:
<Urmel> <T>0</T> <T>6</T> <T>12</T> <T>18</T> <T>24</T> [...]
A <T> indicates a point in time. <T>s are ordered numerically. Direct siblings define an interval starting at the earlier <T> and ending before the later <T>.
Should have be more explicit here and state that the first interval goes from 0 to 6, the second one from 6 to 12, and so on.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] current() - referring to , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] current() - referring to , Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] current() - referring to , David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] current() - referring to , Andrew Welch |
Month |