Subject: Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:44:52 +0100 |
>>>>> "Ken" == G Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Ken> At 2008-08-29 12:42 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote: >> No - they are not available for XSLT users. The author of the >> XSLT transformation could be considered the sender, and the >> XSLT processor could be considered the receiver. Ken> I disagree. The sender of an XML document creates "data" and Ken> the invoker of the stylesheet is the receiver of that Ken> transformed "data". I see the stylesheet in this scenario as Ken> a black box. Well, at best it's non-portable, since an XSLT transformer would be fully compliant if it silently stripped any non-characters. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] (simple?) xpath question, mark bordelon |
Month |