Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem From: mark bordelon <markcbordelon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:19:17 -0700 (PDT) |
I did understand you mean the first node, not the first attribute. Comprehension check: Does this at all contradict what Darcy wrote? I don't think it does...but just making sure. --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 11:17 AM I wrote: > //A[contains((B/@a[1]), 'foo')] but meant: //A[contains((B/@a)[1], 'foo')] ...but hopefully you got the idea! -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 prob, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 prob, Darcy Parker |
Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 prob, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 prob, Darcy Parker |
Month |