Subject: Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node() From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:53:17 -0400 |
So, instead, you'd have to write (@* | ./descendant::*/@*). In that case, the actual definition of // is handy.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Evan Lenz | Thread | Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Evan Lenz |
Re: [xsl] Fundimentle Predicate Pro, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Tag movement in XML, Wendell Piez |
Month |