Subject: RE: [xsl] Issue processing heterogeneous DITA files From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:03:44 +0100 |
> The solution is a slightly kludgy use of named xsl:outputs, > referenced by an <xsl:result-document>, as follows: You can specify the variable serialization parameters directly on xsl:result-document rather than having multiple xsl:output declarations if you prefer. > So I'm left wondering why the use of > attribute-value templates has been restricted in this way It's often hard to explain why a WG reaches the decision it does. This one was debated, and the WG decided against allowing AVTs. No doubt each member of the WG had their own reasons, these are not minuted. Personally I don't see any problems with allowing AVTs on top-level declarations (and I think it was allowed on some Saxon releases), but the architecture of different processors varies and some implementations may have found it difficult or inefficient to support this. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Issue processing heteroge, Darcy Parker | Thread | [xsl] order by in XPath 2.0 express, Darcy Parker |
Re: [xsl] Issue processing heteroge, Darcy Parker | Date | [xsl] order by in XPath 2.0 express, Darcy Parker |
Month |