Subject: [xsl] Re: Benefits of xsl.sequence From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:56:08 +0300 |
Whenever you think of xsl:function (or xsl:sequence) as source of
intermediate result,
that you won't output in the tree immediately, you notice that xsl:sequence
is more efficient:
<xsl:function name="t:add" as="xs:integer"> <xsl:param name="first" as="xs:integer"/> <xsl:param name="second" as="xs:integer"/> <xsl:sequence select="$first + $second"/> </xsl:function/>
Why is <xsl:sequence select="$first + $second"/> more efficient than <xsl:value-of select="$first + $second"/>?
I can understand that math on atomic values ought to be more efficient than math on text nodes,
but is the benefits something we can measure in any meaningful sense?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Benefits of xsl.seque, Jesper Tverskov | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Benefits of xsl.seque, Jesper Tverskov |
Re: [xsl] Re: Benefits of xsl.seque, Jesper Tverskov | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Benefits of xsl.seque, Andrew Welch |
Month |