Subject: RE: [xsl] Identifier attribute (was: Re: [xsl] Creating Hierarchy) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:33:58 +0100 |
> In all of the XML vocabularies I've designed for clients, > standards and myself the last few years I've been avoiding: > > id= > > in favour of: > > xml:id= > > ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/ > > because of the implied semantics. > > I haven't run into any hiccoughs in any way by doing so ... > has anyone run into roadblocks or unintended consequences > doing the same? I agree that's probably best practice nowadays. I don't think you can assume that every combination of XML parser / XSLT processor will make xml:id values accessible to the id() function, but then that's true for DTD-declared ID attributes as well. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Identifier attribute (was: Re, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Identifier attribute (was, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] Identifier attribute (was: Re, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] want to add node number t, Fred Christian |
Month |