Subject: Re: [xsl] XQuery Updates in XSLT From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:22:41 -0700 |
> Dimitre, you're well aware that the specification is not a tutorial. > > Liam I am well aware of that, Liam. I am also aware that a specification does not necessarily have to look and feel repulsive. Examples of very good specifications are the XSLT 2.0 and the XPath/XQuery F & O specs. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Liam Quin <liam@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:41:15PM -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote: >> The spec is too complex and presents definite challenge for >> understanding. > > Dimitre, you're well aware that the specification is not a tutorial. > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XQuery Updates in XSLT, Liam Quin | Thread | [xsl] Extracting Unique element nam, Ganesh Babu N |
RE: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Extensions in AltovaXML, Colin Adams |
Month |