Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1 From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:38:58 -0000 |
> That is, what I propose could have been done, but it would be > a too clumsy road to follow? I don't think it could have been specified in a way that would pass the technical scrutiny that is applied to W3C specifications. (This is not uncommon. Saxon-SA for example implements a try/catch mechanism. It is much easier to implement this in code than to specify its behaviour with the level of precision needed to get through the W3C process.) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Jesper Tverskov | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] XPath "//", speed, and Sa, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Wendell Piez |
Month |