Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:56:52 -0700 |
> If it's a global variable in a module intended for reuse, I would say > that you should certainly do this. On the other side, using global variables (extensively) may not probably be a best practice in any programming language and especially so in a functional programming language. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> "JamesXslt" == JamesXslt Smith <jamesxsltsmith@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > JamesXslt> Hi, Wondering if qualifying variable names in XSLT 2.0 > JamesXslt> is a good idea as in: > > JamesXslt> <xsl:variable name="a:x">...</xsl:variable> > > JamesXslt> where the prefix a is bound to a namespace URI. > > If it's a global variable in a module intended for reuse, I would say > that you should certainly do this. > -- > Colin Adams > Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman |
[xsl] xsl:sort with nulls at end, Rebecca Sapir | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort with nulls at en, Michael Kay |
Month |