Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:20:36 +0100 (CET) |
"G. Ken Holman" wrote: > When it is a namespace of a vocabulary I've made public, I use HTML > documents at the URI of the URL: > http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/ns/xslstyle > http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/ns/xslstyle/vocabulary > ... which eventually will be XHTML with RDDL Yes, I think this is the best practice I've seen so far for public URIs. > When it is a private or temporary namespace, I use a URN: > urn:X-Crane:project:subproject:module:etc.:etc.:etc. Interesting, sounds like a good idea! > Per the recommendation I do not use a URI construed as a relative > URI as that practice is deprecated: Yes (I included those examples on purpose :-p). > I hope this helps. As usual! Thank you, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] Timezone concept broken i, Michael Ludwig |
Month |