Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:07:05 +0000 |
>> I've often thought Final and Abstract type modifiers would be >> useful, maybe now would be a good time to submit a proposal for >> 2.1. > >> We can already simulate Abstract, but an explicit attribute could >> be preferable to throwing an error in a named template, or a >> missing select on a required parameter (or a typed variable etc). > > I am not sure to see exactly what you mean by Final and Abstract. > Could you please explain it a bit further, or show a sample of use > of what you have in mind? The link from Mike explains it (and a lot more!): http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5312. In summary: Final = cannot be overridden, Abstract = must be overridden. I like pretty much all of what is proposed there... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] Timezone concept broken i, Deborah Pickett | Date | Re: [xsl] Timezone concept broken i, Michael Ludwig |
Month |