Subject: Re: [xsl] no output files From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:43:59 -0800 |
> More precisely, I think the point is to return nothing, *by using the > variable*. For instance: > > <xsl:sequence select="$sink[not-exists]"/> > Yes, any boolean value that the XSLT processor and optimizer cannot guess is false(), and will need to evaluate. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > >> theFunc() will have a global variable that wraps all >> transformation. >> theFunc() will return nothing. > > More precisely, I think the point is to return nothing, *by using the > variable*. For instance: > > <xsl:sequence select="$sink[not-exists]"/> > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] no output files, Florent Georges | Thread | RE: [xsl] no output files, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs. xsl:temp, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs. xsl:temp, Florent Georges |
Month |