Subject: Re: [xsl] Random selection From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:08:18 -0800 |
> If I know my stylesheet will always run in a Java environment, what's > the harm in using the Java extensions provided by the processor? This may be harmful not to you but to the people to whom you are recommending the non-portable solution -- maybe 60% or more of the subscribers in this mailing list. I am surprized you didn't even mention exslt's random:random-sequence(). -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dimitre, > I would prefer a portable solution if it's really required (i.e., my > IT architecture demands it). > > If I know my stylesheet will always run in a Java environment, what's > the harm in using the Java extensions provided by the processor? > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Dimitre Novatchev > <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Mukul, >> >> What about people, who use C#, Python, VB, C++, ..., etc? >> >> I strongly believe that recommending a non-portable solution on this >> list when a known, 100% XSLT, portable one exists, should be >> discouraged. >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Dimitre Novatchev > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Random selection, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Random selection, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Random selection, sudheshna iyer | Date | Re: [xsl] Multiple Character Encodi, Ramkumar Menon |
Month |