Subject: Re: [xsl] Random selection From: sudheshna iyer <sudheshnaiyer@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:22:11 -0800 (PST) |
I got it working using java transformation. I was receiving "Missing or incorrect XSLT Namespace." because I had same html file that the transformatoin was trying to produce. Thanks Mukul. Do anybody know how to make it work using xml spy? --- On Sun, 11/30/08, sudheshna iyer <sudheshnaiyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: sudheshna iyer <sudheshnaiyer@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [xsl] Random selection > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sunday, November 30, 2008, 1:08 PM > Thank you very much Mukul. This is exactly what I am looking > for. > > One more question. > > 1. How do you do xsl transformation. When I tried to do xsl > transformation using the following xsl and xml from xml spy, > I am receiving the following error. > > This file is not valid. > Error in xpath expression. Function not found in > namespace.. > > 2. When I tried to transformation using java: > > ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); > SAXTransformerFactory saxTFactory = > ((SAXTransformerFactory) tf); > tHandler1 = saxTFactory.newTransformerHandler(new > StreamSource(xsllocation)); --> Missing or incorrect XSLT > Namespace. > Transformer tr1 = tHandler1.getTransformer(); > > xsllocation --> this is the location of xsl file in > your local directory. > > What is the way that you recomment? > > Thanks again for your help > > --- On Sun, 11/30/08, Mukul Gandhi > <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [xsl] Random selection > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sunday, November 30, 2008, 12:52 PM > > Hi Dimitre, > I would prefer a portable solution if it's really > required (i.e., my > IT architecture demands it). > > If I know my stylesheet will always run in a Java > environment, what's > the harm in using the Java extensions provided by the > processor? > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Dimitre Novatchev > <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mukul, > > > > What about people, who use C#, Python, VB, C++, ..., > etc? > > > > I strongly believe that recommending a non-portable > solution on this > > list when a known, 100% XSLT, portable one exists, > should be > > discouraged. > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Dimitre Novatchev > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Random selection, sudheshna iyer | Thread | Re: [xsl] Random selection, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Multiple Character Encodi, Ramkumar Menon | Date | Re: [xsl] Random selection, Vladimir Nesterovsky |
Month |