Subject: Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:20:55 +0100 (CET) |
Andrew Welch wrote: > Sometimes it's bit nicer to keep them separate: > match="p[not(node())]"/> > match="q[not(node())]"/> Yup. And if the predicate is quite complex, one can always encapsulate it into a user-defined function: match="p[my:predicate(.)]"/> Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error, Ruud Grosmann | Thread | [xsl] cross reference call of templ, Michael Richter |
Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error, Ruud Grosmann | Date | [xsl] cross reference call of templ, Michael Richter |
Month |