Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: ANN: A static code quality tool, for XSLT code From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:27:28 -0800 |
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It seems to me that for code that is heavily expressed within >> XPath 2.0 expressions, the tool presented by Mukul is of limited use >> only. > > I agree with this. The tool I posted checks for quality of XSLT code, > and not much the XPath code. > But this so called "XPath code" *is* in fact XSLT code. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: ANN: A static code qu, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: ANN: A static code qu, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Re: Defining a Variable t, Andrew Ferk | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Defining a Variable t, Andrew Ferk |
Month |