RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling

Subject: RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling
From: "J. S. Rawat" <jrawat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:22:47 +0530

At 03:24 AM 1/7/2009, Scott Trenda wrote:

<x>See following image: <?image base64="R0lGODlhDQANAMQ0IAOw==" ?></x>

Yes!!! This one is better option to use PIs rather than CDATA. Thanks you all for having better discussion specially David and Michael who compel me to say the truth as I was happy to sit keep quite.

Thanks once again!!!

...JSR

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, (continued) Scott Trenda - 6 Jan 2009 21:54:54 -0000 Evan Lenz - 7 Jan 2009 00:02:24 -0000 Message not available G. Ken Holman - 7 Jan 2009 00:56:21 -0000 Wendell Piez - 7 Jan 2009 16:49:10 -0000 Message not available J. S. Rawat - 7 Jan 2009 03:54:06 -0000 <= Wendell Piez - 6 Jan 2009 17:11:04 -0000 Ken Starks - 6 Jan 2009 12:59:56 -0000 David Carlisle - 6 Jan 2009 13:16:46 -0000 Ken Starks - 6 Jan 2009 14:13:07 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, Wendell Piez	Thread	Re: [xsl] CDATA Handling, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] XSLT, Web applications, a, Robert Koberg	Date	[xsl] Implicit casting from double , Mukul Gandhi
	Month