Subject: Re: [xsl] How to achieve FO Table variable width with nowrap on cells From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +1100 |
It seems that I am having success with a table defined like this:
<table>
<table-body border-bottom="solid 1px #000">
<table-row>
<table-cell><block>Label Cell:</block></table-cell>
<table-cell><block padding-left=".05in">Value Cell</block></table-cell>
</table-row
</table-body>
</table>
Is it correct to assume that the table width will derive from the total width of content (until it reaches parent object boundary width)?
Or to be safe, should I conform with your option #1?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 4:50 PM, G. Ken Holman
<gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (1) - use table-layout="fixed" and wrap the content of each cell in a block
> keeping the line contents together with something like wrap-option="no-wrap"
> or with a keep-together.within-line= to force the formatter to make its
> table column decisions without breaking the line content
-- Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO, UBL and code list hands-on training classes: : Sydney, AU 2009-01/02; Brussels, BE 2009-03; Prague, CZ 2009-03 Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18 Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18 G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] How to achieve FO Table v, Karl Stubsjoen | Thread | Re: [xsl] How to achieve FO Table v, Karl Stubsjoen |
Re: [xsl] Changing a Tree Walking, , G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] FO border-end-width condi, G. Ken Holman |
Month |