Subject: [xsl] Re: xsl:namespace|
From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:04:49 +0200
But the two proposals of Florent and Vladimir are basically the literal example one more time where xsl:namespace is not needed unless in a dynamic solution as in my alternative 3. We could make Vladimir's dynamic but it will not make it less artificial or confusing than my own example. Instead of the xsi namespace we will get some other namespace.