Subject: Re: [xsl] SGML to XML From: Xmlizer <xmlizer+xsllist@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:24:05 +0100 |
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> In practice, I discover that Google can't tell me about any SGML >> parser on the Web that says it can emit SAX events. This >> surprises me a bit: the thing I wanted most, in the first ten >> years I used SGML, was something very much like XSLT. Do all the >> people currently using SGML find themselves so happy with their >> existing tools that they never want to use XSLT? Wow; better >> tools than I remember having :) Probably you should look at "SGML ESIS Event" instead of "SAX for SGML" It means there might need so crafting around, but it could be done Xmlizer
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] SGML to XML, C. M. Sperberg-McQue | Thread | Re: [xsl] SGML to XML, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] disable-output-escaping (grea, J. S. Rawat | Date | Re: [xsl] Tokenizing and transformi, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |