Subject: Re: [xsl] Which XSLT processor on website? From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:54:49 +0200 |
If you are doing the transform in the Mozilla client, you'll have to useI don't know any browser with XSLT 2.0... and Konqueror is the only famous browser I know without XSLT.
XSLT 1.0, not XSLT 2.0. Point your browser at
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/processor-version.xsl to
confirm what version of XSLT it supports.
Also, you won't be able to feed just half the webpage to the XSLTIf you consider XForms, that's just what it's done : XHTML with specific XML inside. Namespaces are there to distinguish the different elements. XSLTForms, my project for implementing XForms on client-side, is based on XSLT 1.0 to generated (X)HTML+Ajax and it works directly in browsers.
transform unless you are willing to do tricks with Javascript. Either
the XML should be just the variable information with the stylesheet
providing the static information or if the XML contains the static
information, the stylesheet should just copy the static information in
the source through to the result.
Alain Couthures <agenceXML> Bordeaux, France XForms for browsers without plug-in : http://www.agencexml.com/xsltforms
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Which XSLT processor on w, Tony Graham | Thread | [xsl] XSL2 string result from XSL1 , Trevor Nicholls |
Re: [xsl] Which XSLT processor on w, Tony Graham | Date | Re: [xsl] XML transformation based , David Carlisle |
Month |