Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPATH 2.0 From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:30:11 +0200 |
I wonder, why the current browsers do not yet implement xslt/xpath 2.0 neither does php. Am I right?There might be strategic reasons for that. XForms and SVG are not natively supported (expect for FireFox and SVG...) even though they have a major rendering contribution. And what about CSS support...
Is the xslt/xpath 2.0 recommendation rather a bubble orXSLT/XPath 2.0 is perfect for enterprise solutions with gigabytes of XML Data to process. XSLT at browser side is not very much used yet and will never process such quantity of data...
does it make sense to teach it to undergraduate students? Why?
Are there signs on the horizon that xslt/xpath 2.0 will become more spread soon?
Alain Couthures <agenceXML> Bordeaux, France
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPATH 2.0, G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT/XPATH 2.0, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPATH 2.0, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT/XPATH 2.0, Michael Kay |
Month |