Re: [xsl] returning nodes which have a specific child

Subject: Re: [xsl] returning nodes which have a specific child
From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:52:43 +0530

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Michael Sokolov<sokolov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> including the
> bizarre conceit that attribute *nodes* are not matched by the 'node()' test
> (perhaps some other name would have been more appropriate?).

I am not aware of the discussions, that went amongst the WG members,
when XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 was designed.

But I think,
Calling attributes as "nodes" is ok. As attributes are modeled similar
to other kinds of nodes. They have name, value, parent etc.

Attributes can be referred as @* while other kinds of nodes with
node() and so on.

I find this design ok :)

-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] returning nodes which have a specific child, (continued) Michael Ludwig - 2 Jul 2009 10:15:18 -0000 Michael Kay - 2 Jul 2009 11:02:17 -0000 jim mcgovern - 2 Jul 2009 15:39:32 -0000 Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 13:06:43 -0000 Mukul Gandhi - 3 Jul 2009 13:23:26 -0000 <= Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 13:56:24 -0000 David Carlisle - 3 Jul 2009 14:15:07 -0000 Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 14:34:12 -0000 Mukul Gandhi - 3 Jul 2009 15:43:22 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] returning nodes which have a specific child, (continued)
- Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 13:06:43 -0000
  - Mukul Gandhi - 3 Jul 2009 13:23:26 -0000 <=
    - Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 13:56:24 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 3 Jul 2009 14:15:07 -0000
    - Michael Sokolov - 3 Jul 2009 14:34:12 -0000
    - Mukul Gandhi - 3 Jul 2009 15:43:22 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov	Thread	RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov
RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov	Date	RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home