Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1 From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:44:21 -0700 |
> Yes, that's a tough one. There have been four XSLT 2.0 implementations which > is not unreasonable (how many independent implementations of Javascript are > there? How many are needed?). Ok, so I'm missing one. I'm aware of Saxon, Altova, and IBM (a beta, I thought?) implementing XSLT 2 systems. I had thought Intel was going to build one, but I had also thought they pulled out. Who is the forth (if I even have the other two correct)? Jim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - James A. Robinson jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx Stanford University HighWire Press http://highwire.stanford.edu/ +1 650 7237294 (Work) +1 650 7259335 (Fax)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Martin Honnen |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, James Fuller | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Martin Honnen |
Month |