Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1
From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:44:21 -0700
> Yes, that's a tough one. There have been four XSLT 2.0 implementations which
> is not unreasonable (how many independent implementations of Javascript are
> there? How many are needed?). 

Ok, so I'm missing one. I'm aware of Saxon, Altova, and IBM (a beta,
I thought?) implementing XSLT 2 systems.  I had thought Intel was going
to build one, but I had also thought they pulled out.  Who is the forth
(if I even have the other two correct)?

Jim

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
James A. Robinson                       jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Stanford University HighWire Press      http://highwire.stanford.edu/
+1 650 7237294 (Work)                   +1 650 7259335 (Fax)

Current Thread