Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:output and xsl:result-document From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:22:14 -0400 |
Thanks Martin and Andrew - these are both helpful suggestions. As it turned out in my case, I was able to output text while declaring it to be xml: I didn't think this would work, but apparently at least Saxon will allow you to output an xml document that contains only text: no elements, which is just what I needed.
If you use disable-output-escaping="yes" and omit-xml-declaration="yes" (and don't output any elements) then yes, the XML output method becomes very close to the text output method. But it seems clearer to use method="text", and there is nothing that stops you using different output methods for different result documents. And relying on disable-output-escaping seems very error prone - the first time you encounter data containing "<" or "&", you're going to find that you forgot to put d-o-e on the relevant xsl:value-of instruction.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:output and xsl:result, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:output and xsl:result, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] xsl:output and xsl:result, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Finding first difference , mlcook |
Month |