Subject: Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:36:24 -0800 |
> The following proposal comes to my mind :) > > <xsl:context ref="nodeReference"> > B <xsl:call-template name="xx"> > > B B </xsl:call-template> > </xsl:context> > > Here, the template "xx" get's a context as node, "nodeReference". Such a feature is not needed, especially in XSLT 2, where the use of <xsl:call-template> shouldn't be recommended -- why would anyone prefer it to the use of <xsl:function> ? Even in XSLT 1.0 <xsl:call-template> is not necessary -- one can always accomplish the same with <xsl:apply-templates>. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |