Subject: Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:43:31 -0800 |
Andrew Welch said: > > Push is simply where the document order drives the processing... not > sure where modes or namespaces come into it. > Pull is when you know exactly which template will be selected for processing -- the order of processing is not important at all (because as we know in an FP language order is not guaranteed (except when we take particular measures, such as using monad-like programming) at all -- so even with pull processing we have no guarantees about the order of processing. Note that other FP languages do not have the topic of push/pull -- this is exactly because they dont have the possibility of numerous matching templates. > > It's fine to a have just one template with a particular mode, not > redundant at all, but again I've no idea what that has to do with > push/pull. See explanation above. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Month |