RE: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts)

> I very much agree that change marks based on authored markup 
> would be the best solution. For a very technical audience I 
> am nevertheless interested in process (b), at the XML level. 
> I am well aware of the complexity of a Longest Common String 
> algorithm combined with inserted/deleted/moved elements plus 
> constraints based on id attributes... Is the process (b) you 
> mentioned an open resource?

I believe Norm Walsh's diffmk tool was used. I don't know where the
definitive source for this is.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts), (continued) Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 11:45:36 -0000 David Carlisle - 16 Dec 2009 11:57:58 -0000 Michael Kay - 16 Dec 2009 13:47:13 -0000 Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 16 Dec 2009 14:08:22 -0000 Michael Kay - 16 Dec 2009 14:31:54 -0000 <= Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 14:54:10 -0000 David Carlisle - 16 Dec 2009 15:05:02 -0000 Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 15:29:51 -0000 Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 15:39:57 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts), (continued)
- Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 14:54:10 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 16 Dec 2009 15:05:02 -0000
    - Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 15:29:51 -0000
    - Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 15:39:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Michael Müller-Hille	Thread	Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Eliot Kimber
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Michael Müller-Hille	Date	Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Eliot Kimber
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home