Subject: Re: [xsl] Client-side cross-platform API From: Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:09:19 -0500 |
That's a little unfair; generally their products use the standard's spec if one exists at the time they implement the feature. It'd be more accurate to say that they won't remove support for their existing syntax/architecture when a new one is introduced in a W3C spec. ~ Scott -----Original Message----- From: Rob Belics [mailto:rob_belics@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:50 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Client-side cross-platform API On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:32 -0500, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 23:58 +0000, Michael Kay wrote: > > > It seems there is one API for Microsoft and one for everyone else > I've often wondered why we (W3C) don't standardise one or the other... > > Liam > Because Microsoft will always be on the opposing side.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Client-side cross-platfor, Rob Belics | Thread | Re: [xsl] Client-side cross-platfor, Rob Belics |
Re: [xsl] Ignore closing tag, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Client-side cross-platfor, Rob Belics |
Month |