Subject: [xsl] What are the best XSLT 1 or XSLT 2 performance benchmarks available today? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:23:06 -0800 |
Hi, Does anybody know what, if any, XSLT 1 or XSLT 2 performance benchmarks are available and which of them are the best? I tried to find XSLTMark, but it seems to have disappeared. Also, is it meaningful to try to compare the performance of an XSLT 1.0 processor with that of an XSLT 2.0 (basic or SA)? If, for example, people are considering to make the move from using XSLT 1.0 to XSLT 2.0 and need assuarance that the famous XSLT 2.0 processor "X" is not "significantly less performant" than their current XSLT 1.0 processor "Y", what would be the best performance experiment to provide some *meaningful and useful* data for them to decide? -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:copy-of issue, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Thread | RE: [xsl] What are the best XSLT 1 , Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Ignore closing tag, Abel Braaksma | Date | RE: [xsl] What are the best XSLT 1 , Michael Kay |
Month |