Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?
From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:31:05 +0300
surely no :)

truly cooperation is much better then false competition :)

2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Yes, well, my response to Vyacheslav was a tad rhetorical.
>
> So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again.
>
> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than Saxon/Java
> (notwithstanding .Net autoport)),
> does *any other* community really want one?"
>
> Regards
> Justin Johansson
>
>
> Andrew Welch wrote:
>>
>> I don't think "XRX" literally means just those 3 parts, it means an
>> XML Server back end, XQuery and XSLT as the application code
>> generating (X)HTML and/or XForms for the front end, passing around XML
>> over http (some of the REST crowd get upset about using REST loosely)
>>
>> The key ingredients are the XML Server and the fact that its end-to-end
>> XML.
>>
>>
>> 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>>
>>> An unexpected but nevertheless an interesting answer.
>>>
>>> FWIW, From the first sentence of the Wikipedia writeup on XRX:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRX_(web_application_architecture)
>>>
>>> "In software development XRX is a web application architecture based on
>>> XForms, REST and XQuery."
>>>
>>> Not a mention of XSLT there so to challenge your response ...
>>>
>>> Would it be reasonable to rephrase my question as:
>>>
>>> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT 2 for XRX), does the XRX community really
>>> want
>>> one?"
>>>
>>> (Notwithstanding, and with no disrespect to, Saxon of course).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Justin Johansson

Current Thread