Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

[Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

2010/1/19 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Andrew Welch wrote:
>>
>> 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Yes, well, my response to Vyacheslav was a tad rhetorical.
>>>
>>> So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again.
>>>
>>> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than Saxon/Java
>>> (notwithstanding .Net autoport)),
>>> does *any other* community really want one?"
>>>
>>
>> As was mentioned earlier in the thread, Intel and IBM both have their
>> own commercial xslt 2.0 processors, and MarkLogic is adding xslt 2.0
>> support in version 5... (because of popular demand)
>>
>> Everyone wants XSLT 2.0, it's the best!
>>
>>
>
> First, thanks to all for replies to my inquiry on this thread and also many thanks to Abel Braaksma for seeding this discussion.
>
> Yay, Andrew, I don't need any convincing of, as you say, "XSLT 2.0, it's the best" :-)
>
> What I was hoping for was more convincing that there are real gaps in the "market" for XSLT 2.0 engines and particularly in the C/C++ implementation space.
>

Porting Saxon from Java to C++ would be a good move !

Aaron