Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:55:11 -0500 |
> * On the other hand, I do think there is a need for XSLT 2.0 in C/C++,
I didn't say there was no need for new XSLT 2.0 processors -- just that the need is for good ones :)
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray |
[xsl] Balisage 2010 Call for Partic, B Tommie Usdin | Date | [xsl] xsl transform for DOAJ?, Lynn Murdock |
Month |