Subject: RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:30:35 -0000 |
> If we have a look at the source for the XSLT 2.0 spec, the > following might surprise you: > > <meta name="generator" content= > "HTML Tidy for Mac OS X (vers 1st December 2004), see > www.w3.org" /> The build scripts generate HTML from XML using XSLT as you would expect. As a final step they then put the HTML through the tidy process. I've been wanting to get rid of this step for a while because I don't think it should be necessary: someone added it because it was easier than fixing the source XML and/or the stylesheets whenever the combination was found to generate invalid HTML (which generally arises through problems of nesting paragraphs within lists within paragraphs, etc.) Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Abel Braaksma | Thread | Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: HTML table colspec an, Siddhi Thakkar |
Month |