Subject: RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:03:24 -0000 |
> i guess OpenOffice is best authoring tool - is not it? For authoring XML documents I sometimes use Stylus Studio, sometimes oXygen. What's "best" for you depends on your requirements and your preferences. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay > > 2010/1/24 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > For the next version of XSLT I've also added tools that > >> will generate > >> > SVG diagrams from source XML descriptions of trees. > >> > >> Don't suppose you plan to make this snippet public? > >> > > > > I'll focus my efforts on getting the spec out first. Then > ask me how > > it was done. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael Kay > > http://www.saxonica.com/ > > http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Vyacheslav Sedov | Thread | Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Vyacheslav Sedov | Date | Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Month |