Subject: Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:56:42 -0500 |
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:19 +1030, Justin Johansson wrote: > He's mainly on about the conundrum surrounding XML 5th edition to which > my thoughts were: > > "As an implementor, this Qname change presents for me yet another hurdle. It doesn't change it a whole lot from XML 1.1. You were supporting XML 1.1, right? If no, what hope would there have been that you'd have supported an XML 1.2? Even less. If yes, quit complaining :-) Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, Justin Johansson | Thread | Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, ac |
Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, Justin Johansson | Date | Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, ac |
Month |