Re: [xsl] Order of items in current-group()

[Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmmm...

As the original question is not yet answered, the order is specified here:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xslt20-20070123/#element-for-each-group




On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Dimitre Novatchev
<dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To put it in a more understandable way, the order of items in the
> current-group() is the same as their order in the sequence, specified
> in the @select attribute of <xsl:for-each-group>.
>
>
> Hope that in the next spec they will not use latin words that would
> require 5 years medical education to understand.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
> you're doing is work or play
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx>
wrote:
>>
>> Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote:
>>
>>> Whether the xslt 2.0 spec defines the order of items in sequence returned
from current-group() function?
>>
>> The select attribute of xsl:for-each-group selects a sequence of items,
called the population. The order of items in that sequence is called the
population order. When forming the groups, the items in the population are
examined in population order and then, if they belong to a group, added to a
group. So that way the order of items in the population determines the order
of items in a group.
>>
>> --
>>
>> B  B  B  B Martin Honnen
>> B  B  B  B http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/
>>
>



--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without
a messy bloodbath.