Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:10:51 -0500 |
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 10:39 +0000, Andrew Welch wrote: > On 3 March 2010 10:33, Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/03/10 10:09, Michael Kay wrote: > > > >> There's a lot of interest > >> at the moment in defining features for access to web services, but it's > >> happening outside the W3C working group. > > > > Pity, sound like a good clean addition to XSLT 2.x > > Any more information Mike/Liam? > > What would it offer over and above doc() and xml-over-http ? doc is restricted to HTTP GET (e.g. can't POST), and you don't have enough control to construct an XML SOAP document based on a WSDL definition and send that as a SOAP payload, using serialization options to ensure there's no generated DOCTYPE, and if necessary supplying authentication information... Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, James A. Robinson | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Alex Clark |
Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Philip Fearon | Date | Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Dave Pawson |
Month |