Re: [xsl] Problem of template priority

Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem of template priority
From: "Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex" <gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:55:39 +0200
On 29.04.2010 10:22, Michael Kay wrote:
Well, importance trumps priority.

I like "importance". It's officially called "import precedence", but "importance" would have been a much better word for it!

"Importance" is a nice pun, but I don't think it's very intuitive, because it corresponds with "import precedence" reciprocally: the "less imported" a template rule, function, etc. is, the higher is its importance (if synonymous to import precedence).


Current Thread